Bertino v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bertino v. State

1912 OK CR 285, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 713, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 106

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 4, 1912

DocketNo. A-554.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 285 (Bertino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bertino v. State, 1912 OK CR 285, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 713, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 106 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe Bertino and Joe Nigro were convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county, of the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. Bertino was sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail, and Nigro was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and serve a term of thirty days in the county jail. The judgment was entered January 21, 1910. We have carefully examined the record and no prejudicial error appears. We are of the opinion that the verdict and judgment was right.’ The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed and the case remanded thereto with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joe Bertino and Joe Nigro were convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county, of the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. Bertino was sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail, and Nigro was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and serve a term of thirty days in the county jail. The judgment was entered January 21, 1910. We have carefully examined the record and no prejudicial error appears. We are of the opinion that the verdict and judgment was right.’ The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed and the case remanded thereto with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 285, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 713, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertino-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.