Bertha M. Reagan v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

Fourth Circuit

Bertha M. Reagan v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475, 1995 WL 371009

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1995

Docket95-1097

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Bertha M. Reagan v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bertha M. Reagan v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475, 1995 WL 371009 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bertha M. REAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1097.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Bertha M. Reagan, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Lamar Paxton, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying her motion for further review of the denial of her claim for social security disability benefits based on newly submitted medical evidence. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.* Reagan v. Chater, No. CA-93-1488-1-19AJ (D.S.C. June 2 & Dec. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to review by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bertha M. REAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1097.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Bertha M. Reagan, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Lamar Paxton, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying her motion for further review of the denial of her claim for social security disability benefits based on newly submitted medical evidence. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.* Reagan v. Chater, No. CA-93-1488-1-19AJ (D.S.C. June 2 & Dec. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to review by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475, 1995 WL 371009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertha-m-reagan-v-shirley-s-chater-commissioner-of-ca4-1995.