Bertha Alvarez v. Woodlands Network Solutions, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bertha Alvarez v. Woodlands Network Solutions, Inc.

DecidedFebruary 15, 2007

Docket14-06-01045-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Bertha Alvarez v. Woodlands Network Solutions, Inc. (Bertha Alvarez v. Woodlands Network Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bertha Alvarez v. Woodlands Network Solutions, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-01045-CV

BERTHA ALVAREZ, Appellant

V.

WOODLANDS NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-65196

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed August 21, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on November 17, 2006. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). After being given fifteen-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal for non-payment of the filing fee, appellant did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

No clerk=s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On January 21, 2007, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant also filed no response to this notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-01045-CV

BERTHA ALVAREZ, Appellant

V.

WOODLANDS NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-65196

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed August 21, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on November 17, 2006. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). After being given fifteen-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal for non-payment of the filing fee, appellant did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

No clerk=s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On January 21, 2007, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant also filed no response to this notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 15, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bertha Alvarez v. Woodlands Network Solutions, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertha-alvarez-v-woodlands-network-solutions-inc-texapp-2007.