Bert W. Martin & Ada L. Martin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 424 F.2d 1368 (Bert W. Martin & Ada L. Martin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
424 F.2d 1368
Bert W. MARTIN & Ada L. Martin, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 24528.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 19, 1970.
On Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States; 52 T.C. 140.
Warren Charles Seieroe (argued), Richard E. Murphy, Jr., of McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Robert I. Waxman (argued), Atty., Dept. of Justice, Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Division, K. Martin Worthy, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Hoffman, 9 Cir., 1970, 423 F.2d 1217. See also Stratmore v. United States, 3 Cir., 1970, 420 F.2d 461.
Notes:
Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 F.2d 1368, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1280, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bert-w-martin-ada-l-martin-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca9-1970.