Bershon v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Bershon v. Municipal Court

42 P.2d 649, 5 Cal. App. 2d 519, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100

California Court of Appeal·Decided March 26, 1935·No. Civ. No. 10307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. The order of the superior court, transferring to the municipal court the action described in the petition, was made under authority of section 396 of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended in 1933. The matter was purely procedural, and the order did not constitute an attempt to give retroactive effect to the statute. Under such order and transfer the municipal court has jurisdiction over the action. (McClurg v. McClurg, 212 Cal. 15, at p. 18 [297 Pac. 27].)

An application by petitioner to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on May 6, 1935.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. The order of the superior court, transferring to the municipal court the action described in the petition, was made under authority of section 396 of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended in 1933. The matter was purely procedural, and the order did not constitute an attempt to give retroactive effect to the statute. Under such order and transfer the municipal court has jurisdiction over the action. (McClurg v. McClurg, 212 Cal. 15, at p. 18 [297 Pac. 27].)

An application by petitioner to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on May 6, 1935.

Bershon v. Municipal Court, 42 P.2d 649, 5 Cal. App. 2d 519, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

42 P.2d 649 (Bershon v. Municipal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related