Bershad v. Neimand Bros.

260 A.D. 872, 22 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5161

This text of 260 A.D. 872 (Bershad v. Neimand Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bershad v. Neimand Bros., 260 A.D. 872, 22 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff through falling down an unlighted elevator shaft, he has recovered a judgment against defendant Samuel Gilinsky, from which said defendant appeals. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question of the negligence of the appellant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff was properly submitted to the jury, and its findings should not be disturbed. Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 872, 22 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bershad-v-neimand-bros-nyappdiv-1940.