Bershad v. Kamber
158 N.Y.S. 1108
Opinion
An examination of the complaint herein shows that a good cause of action was stated therein and there was nothing in the opening of plaintiffs’ counsel to the jury which in any way destroyed or impaired the sufficiency of the complaint. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bershad v. Kamber, 158 N.Y.S. 1108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
158 N.Y.S. 1108 (Bershad v. Kamber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.