Bershad v. Kamber
158 N.Y.S. 1108
This text of 158 N.Y.S. 1108 (Bershad v. Kamber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bershad v. Kamber, 158 N.Y.S. 1108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
An examination of the complaint herein shows that a good cause of action was stated therein and there was nothing in the opening of plaintiffs’ counsel to the jury which in any way destroyed or impaired the sufficiency of the complaint. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 N.Y.S. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bershad-v-kamber-nyappterm-1916.