Bersch v. Rust
95 A. 108, 249 Pa. 512, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 752
Opinion
This bill was for the reconveyance of real estate. The court below held that the averment of fraud was not sufficiently specific to sustain the bill, and that the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law against W. L. Raeder for any unpaid balance of the consideration money. For these reasons the bill was properly dismissed and the cause certified to the law side of the court.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bersch v. Rust, 95 A. 108, 249 Pa. 512, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 752 (Pa. 1915).
95 A. 108 (Bersch v. Rust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steven M. Kramer v. Richard Thompson
947 F.2d 666 (Third Circuit, 1991)
Bailey v. Girard Bank
483 A.2d 881 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Willing v. Mazzocone
393 A.2d 1155 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Derry Township School District v. Barnett Coal Co.
2 A.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)