Bersch v. Rust

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bersch v. Rust

95 A. 108, 249 Pa. 512, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 752

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 17, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 264

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 95 A. 108 (Bersch v. Rust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bersch v. Rust, 95 A. 108, 249 Pa. 512, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 752 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This bill was for the reconveyance of real estate. The court below held that the averment of fraud was not sufficiently specific to sustain the bill, and that the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law against W. L. Raeder for any unpaid balance of the consideration money. For these reasons the bill was properly dismissed and the cause certified to the law side of the court.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This bill was for the reconveyance of real estate. The court below held that the averment of fraud was not sufficiently specific to sustain the bill, and that the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law against W. L. Raeder for any unpaid balance of the consideration money. For these reasons the bill was properly dismissed and the cause certified to the law side of the court.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A. 108, 249 Pa. 512, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bersch-v-rust-pa-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack