Berryman v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Berryman v. Daniel

158 S.E. 577, 172 Ga. 700, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 183

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1931·No. No. 8212·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

The grant or refusal of an injunction rests in the sound dis-

cretion of the judge, according to the facts and circumstances of each case. Civil Code (1910), § 5497. In the present case, all the evidence being considered, it is not made to appear that there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in refusing the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

The grant or refusal of an injunction rests in the sound dis-

cretion of the judge, according to the facts and circumstances of each case. Civil Code (1910), § 5497. In the present case, all the evidence being considered, it is not made to appear that there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in refusing the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Berryman v. Daniel, 158 S.E. 577, 172 Ga. 700, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 183 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

158 S.E. 577 (Berryman v. Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.