Berryman v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Berryman v. Daniel

158 S.E. 577, 172 Ga. 700, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 183

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1931

DocketNo. 8212

StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.E. 577 (Berryman v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berryman v. Daniel, 158 S.E. 577, 172 Ga. 700, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 183 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

The grant or refusal of an injunction rests in the sound dis-

cretion of the judge, according to the facts and circumstances of each case. Civil Code (1910), § 5497. In the present case, all the evidence being considered, it is not made to appear that there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in refusing the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

The grant or refusal of an injunction rests in the sound dis-

cretion of the judge, according to the facts and circumstances of each case. Civil Code (1910), § 5497. In the present case, all the evidence being considered, it is not made to appear that there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in refusing the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 S.E. 577, 172 Ga. 700, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berryman-v-daniel-ga-1931.