Berryhill v. Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur

132 S.W. 13, 151 Mo. App. 415, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 798
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 S.W. 13 (Berryhill v. Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berryhill v. Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur, 132 S.W. 13, 151 Mo. App. 415, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 798 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

ELLISON, J.

This action is based on a benefit certificate of insurance on the life of plaintiff’s wife and payable to him at her death. The verdict of the jury in the trial court was for the defendant. Plaintiff’s-motion for a new trial was sustained and thereupon defendant appealed from that order.

The certificate was taken out by Mrs. Berryhill in October, 1908, and she died in about three months thereafter, January 19', 1909. The condition of payment of the certificate was that she should be a member of the association, in good standing, at the time of her death; and the question at the trial was whether she was such member at that time. And that question was to be determined by the issue made as to whether she paid dues for the month of December, 1908.

On that issue plaintiff presented a receipt in evidence showing payment for that month. Defendant attacked the receipt on the ground that it was not for that month and that it had been altered so as to make it show that it was. There were some circumstances from which it could be inferred that it was not intended as a receipt for that month, but there were also circumstances from which it could be inferred that it must have been a receipt for that month.

The trial court has large discretion in granting a new trial, and it is plain that in the foregoing state of the evidence we could not justify ourselves in inter-'' fering with that discretion. [Gould v. St. John, 207 Mo. 619; Karnes v. Winn, 126 Mo. App. 712; Ridge v. Johnson, 129 Mo. App. 541; Canterbury v. Kansas City, 130 Mo. App. 1. The order granting new trial is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fair v. Preston
138 S.W. 73 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.W. 13, 151 Mo. App. 415, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berryhill-v-supreme-tribe-of-ben-hur-moctapp-1910.