Berryhill v. State

276 S.E.2d 926, 276 S.C. 183, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 339
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 9, 1981
Docket21429
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.E.2d 926 (Berryhill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berryhill v. State, 276 S.E.2d 926, 276 S.C. 183, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 339 (S.C. 1981).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant and two codefendants were found guilty of armed robbery and each was sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-three (23) years.

Appellant applied for Post-Conviction Relief and his application was denied after an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed.

Counsel for appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief. . : . I ■! "'pH

During the pendency of this appeal appellant escaped from custody. We decline to hear the appeal of a party who by his escape has evaded the process of the Court and refuses to submit himself to its jurisdiction. State v. Murrell, 33 S. C. 83, 11 S. E. 682 (1890); State v. Johnson, 44 S. C. 556, 21 S. E. 806 (1895). Accordingly, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed and counsel’s request to withdraw is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benedict v. Benedict
313 S.E.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 S.E.2d 926, 276 S.C. 183, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berryhill-v-state-sc-1981.