Berryhill v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Berryhill v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.

479 So. 2d 1250, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 4191

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 1, 1985

Docket84-683

StatusPublished

Cited by18 cases

This text of 479 So. 2d 1250 (Berryhill v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berryhill v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 479 So. 2d 1250, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 4191 (Ala. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Richard Berryhill appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and L.R. Chapman in this action to recover damages for the breach of an employment contract and bad faith discharge. We affirm.

The record presented to this Court on appeal does not contain the depositions and exhibits upon which the trial court based its judgment. Where all the evidence is not in the record, it will be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict or judgment. City of Scottsboro v. Johnson,436 So.2d 859 (Ala. 1983); Valley Mining Corp. v. Metro Bank,383 So.2d 158 (Ala. 1980); Park v. Elliott, 282 Ala. 110,209 So.2d 393 (1968). Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Berryhill appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and L.R. Chapman in this action to recover damages for the breach of an employment contract and bad faith discharge. We affirm.

The record presented to this Court on appeal does not contain the depositions and exhibits upon which the trial court based its judgment. Where all the evidence is not in the record, it will be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict or judgment. City of Scottsboro v. Johnson,436 So.2d 859 (Ala. 1983); Valley Mining Corp. v. Metro Bank,383 So.2d 158 (Ala. 1980); Park v. Elliott, 282 Ala. 110,209 So.2d 393 (1968). Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 So. 2d 1250, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 4191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berryhill-v-mutual-of-omaha-ins-co-ala-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack