Berryhill v. Byington

10 Iowa 223
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 23, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 10 Iowa 223 (Berryhill v. Byington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berryhill v. Byington, 10 Iowa 223 (iowa 1859).

Opinion

Stockton, J.

The answer of the defendant avers that the [224]*224notes sued on were given as part consideration for a tract of land which the plaintiff by his obligation in writing bound himself to convey to the defendant upon the payment of the notes, and that the plaintiff had never at any time executed or delivered, or offered to execute or deliver to defendant any deed of conveyance for said land or any part thereof.

The demurrer to this answer was improperly sustained. Where the conveyance is to be executed upon the payment of the purchase money, the two acts are so far dependent, that to entitle the plaintiff to recover, he must show a performance or offer to perform on his part, by the tender of a conveyance, or an offer to convey on the payment of the purchase money. See School District v. Royers, 8 Iowa, 316 1859 ; 2 Hill. Vendors, page 71.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Todd v. State Bank
182 Iowa 276 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Cooper v. King
34 N.W. 781 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1887)
Powell v. Dayton, Sheridan & Grande Ronde R. R.
12 P. 665 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)
People v. Stephens
51 How. Pr. 235 (New York Supreme Court, 1876)
Winton v. Sherman
20 Iowa 295 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Iowa 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berryhill-v-byington-iowa-1859.