Berryer v. Hertz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Berryer v. Hertz

502 So. 2d 75, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6686

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 1987

DocketNo. 86-903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 75 (Berryer v. Hertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berryer v. Hertz, 502 So. 2d 75, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Manner v. Goldstein Professional Ass’n, 436 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (in divorce action, spouse not permitted to avoid terms of property settlement agreement by simultaneous oral declaration); N.A. Kerson Co., Inc. v. Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Moe Levine, 45 N.Y.2d 730, 408 N.Y.S.2d 475, 380 N.E.2d 302 (App.1978) (in legal malpractice action, where plaintiffs alleged that attorney had improperly entered into a stipulation withdrawing an affirmative defense in was later settled by stipulation entered in open court, plaintiffs were required to prove that they would have succeeded but for the withdrawal of the affirmative defense); cf. Cohen v. Lipsig, 92 A.D.2d 536, 459 N.Y.S.2d 98 (App.Div.1983) (a cause of action for legal malpractice is viable despite plaintiffs settlement of underlying action when such settlement was compelled because of the mistakes of defendant, plaintiffs former counsel).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Manner v. Goldstein Professional Ass’n, 436 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (in divorce action, spouse not permitted to avoid terms of property settlement agreement by simultaneous oral declaration); N.A. Kerson Co., Inc. v. Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Moe Levine, 45 N.Y.2d 730, 408 N.Y.S.2d 475, 380 N.E.2d 302 (App.1978) (in legal malpractice action, where plaintiffs alleged that attorney had improperly entered into a stipulation withdrawing an affirmative defense in was later settled by stipulation entered in open court, plaintiffs were required to prove that they would have succeeded but for the withdrawal of the affirmative defense); cf. Cohen v. Lipsig, 92 A.D.2d 536, 459 N.Y.S.2d 98 (App.Div.1983) (a cause of action for legal malpractice is viable despite plaintiffs settlement of underlying action when such settlement was compelled because of the mistakes of defendant, plaintiffs former counsel).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 So. 2d 75, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berryer-v-hertz-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack