Berry v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Berry v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 324, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1077

United States Customs Court·Decided September 25, 1951·No. No. 55906; protest 146918-K (Galveston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the later hearing, the attorney who appeared as amicus curiae and as counsel for the plaintiff — at the request of the court — stated that his client had failed to take steps to comply with the regulations and law, and that, in his opinion, the court had done everything possible to render justice in the case. Upon the record presented, the court was constrained to overrule the claim for free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the later hearing, the attorney who appeared as amicus curiae and as counsel for the plaintiff — at the request of the court — stated that his client had failed to take steps to comply with the regulations and law, and that, in his opinion, the court had done everything possible to render justice in the case. Upon the record presented, the court was constrained to overrule the claim for free entry.

Berry v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 324, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1077 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

27 Cust. Ct. 324 (Berry v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.