Berry v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Berry v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 324, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1077

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 1951

DocketNo. 55906; protest 146918-K (Galveston)

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 324 (Berry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 324, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1077 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the later hearing, the attorney who appeared as amicus curiae and as counsel for the plaintiff — at the request of the court — stated that his client had failed to take steps to comply with the regulations and law, and that, in his opinion, the court had done everything possible to render justice in the case. Upon the record presented, the court was constrained to overrule the claim for free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the later hearing, the attorney who appeared as amicus curiae and as counsel for the plaintiff — at the request of the court — stated that his client had failed to take steps to comply with the regulations and law, and that, in his opinion, the court had done everything possible to render justice in the case. Upon the record presented, the court was constrained to overrule the claim for free entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Cust. Ct. 324, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-united-states-cusc-1951.