Berry v. State

134 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 593, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1026
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1926
Docket17423
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 144 (Berry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. State, 134 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 593, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1026 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur. Drake & Drake, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Gastellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, E. G. Hill, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 593, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-state-gactapp-1926.