Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Berry v. State

378 So. 2d 1303, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15438

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 2, 1980

DocketNo. 78-2189/T4-242

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 378 So. 2d 1303 (Berry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. State, 378 So. 2d 1303, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15438 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft based on entry of a nolo contendere plea with reservation of right to appeal the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress inculpatory statements. This cause is remanded to give appellant the opportunity to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere and plead anew if he so desires. See Rouch v. State, 378 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979).

REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft based on entry of a nolo contendere plea with reservation of right to appeal the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress inculpatory statements. This cause is remanded to give appellant the opportunity to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere and plead anew if he so desires. See Rouch v. State, 378 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979).

REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

378 So. 2d 1303, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack