Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Berry v. State

345 So. 2d 828, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15544

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 29, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1493

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 828 (Berry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. State, 345 So. 2d 828, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15544 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violation of Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court instructed the jury in accordance with the Florida Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases, using the appropriate instruction for violation of Section 832.05(3). The only issue is whether the trial court committed fundamental error, in view of the defense of good faith, by failing to also charge the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check.

This court has previously held that failure to give this additional instruction is fundamental error, the gravity of which requires reversal. Prince v. State, 333 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). On the authority of oúr holding in Prince, we reverse appellant’s conviction and remand this case for a new trial.

. Because of the conflict which exists between our holding and the Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases we hereby certify to the Supreme Court as a matter of great public interest the following questions:

1. Is the Florida Standard Jury Instruction entitled “Worthless Check — Obtaining Property F.S. 832.05(3)”, set forth on pages 203 and 204 of the Second Edition, defective because it fails to instruct the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check?

2. In a prosecution for violation of Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975), where the trial court has instructed the jury in accordance with the Florida Standard Jury Instruction entitled “Worthless Check — Obtaining Property F.S. 832.05(3)”, as set forth on pages 203 and 204 of the Second Edition, is fundamental error committed when the trial court does not additionally instruct the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check?

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violation of Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court instructed the jury in accordance with the Florida Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases, using the appropriate instruction for violation of Section 832.05(3). The only issue is whether the trial court committed fundamental error, in view of the defense of good faith, by failing to also charge the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check.

This court has previously held that failure to give this additional instruction is fundamental error, the gravity of which requires reversal. Prince v. State, 333 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). On the authority of oúr holding in Prince, we reverse appellant’s conviction and remand this case for a new trial.

. Because of the conflict which exists between our holding and the Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases we hereby certify to the Supreme Court as a matter of great public interest the following questions:

1. Is the Florida Standard Jury Instruction entitled “Worthless Check — Obtaining Property F.S. 832.05(3)”, set forth on pages 203 and 204 of the Second Edition, defective because it fails to instruct the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check?

2. In a prosecution for violation of Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975), where the trial court has instructed the jury in accordance with the Florida Standard Jury Instruction entitled “Worthless Check — Obtaining Property F.S. 832.05(3)”, as set forth on pages 203 and 204 of the Second Edition, is fundamental error committed when the trial court does not additionally instruct the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check?

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 828, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack