Berry v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad
This text of 50 Cal. 435 (Berry v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court below erred in refusing the defendant’s motion to strike out the evidence in relation to injury done to plaintiff’s wheat by the hogs of third persons. Such injury was not direct damage resulting from the trespass of the defendant. The acts complained of by plaintiff were the destruction of a portion of plaintiff’s fences, and the trampling and destruction of grain and herbage, and the plaintiff cannot recover for injury to the grain by cattle of others, damage-feasant for an indefinite or any period after the original entry and trespass.
The court also erred in excluding the articles of incorporation. For any trespass committed prior to the incorporation of the defendant, the individuals committing or direct[438]*438ing such trespass would he responsible in damages, but defendant cannot be made to respond for an injury done before it had an existence.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 Cal. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-san-francisco-north-pacific-railroad-cal-1875.