Berry v. Rudolph

25 So. 2d 207, 157 Fla. 178, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 692
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 12, 1946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order and judgment appealed from is reversed upon the authority of the opinions and decisions in Croft v. Culbreath, 150 Fla. 60, 6 So. (2nd) 638; Ex parte Earman, 85 Fla. 297, 95 So. 755, and cases therein cited, including the well considered opinion of Mr. Justice LAMAR in Gompers v. Buck Stove and Range Co., 221 U.S. 418 31 S.C. 492; 55 Law ed. 797.

Reversed.

*179 CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and BROWN, JJ., concur. SEBRING, J., agrees to conclusion and judgment. THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. Rudolph, 25 So. 2d 207, 157 Fla. 178, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 692 (Fla. 1946).

25 So. 2d 207 (Berry v. Rudolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.
221 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Croft v. Culbreath
6 So. 2d 638 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Ex parte Earman
95 So. 755 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)