Berry v. Rudolph

25 So. 2d 207, 157 Fla. 178, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 692
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 25 So. 2d 207 (Berry v. Rudolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Rudolph, 25 So. 2d 207, 157 Fla. 178, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 692 (Fla. 1946).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order and judgment appealed from is reversed upon the authority of the opinions and decisions in Croft v. Culbreath, 150 Fla. 60, 6 So. (2nd) 638; Ex parte Earman, 85 Fla. 297, 95 So. 755, and cases therein cited, including the well considered opinion of Mr. Justice LAMAR in Gompers v. Buck Stove and Range Co., 221 U.S. 418 31 S.C. 492; 55 Law ed. 797.

Reversed.

*179 CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and BROWN, JJ., concur. SEBRING, J., agrees to conclusion and judgment. THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.
221 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Croft v. Culbreath
6 So. 2d 638 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Ex parte Earman
95 So. 755 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 So. 2d 207, 157 Fla. 178, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-rudolph-fla-1946.