Berry v. Potter
33 A. 455, 57 N.J.L. 201, 28 Vroom 201, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 18
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berry v. Potter, 33 A. 455, 57 N.J.L. 201, 28 Vroom 201, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 18 (N.J. 1894).
33 A. 455 (Berry v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Vaughan
253 S.W.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1952)
In Re Dunn
68 A.2d 783 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)