Berry v. Potter

33 A. 455, 57 N.J.L. 201, 28 Vroom 201, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 18
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 A. 455 (Berry v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Potter, 33 A. 455, 57 N.J.L. 201, 28 Vroom 201, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 18 (N.J. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Vaughan
253 S.W.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1952)
In Re Dunn
68 A.2d 783 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A. 455, 57 N.J.L. 201, 28 Vroom 201, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-potter-nj-1894.