Berry v. Michigan Racing Commissioner

469 U.S. 806, 105 S. Ct. 64, 83 L. Ed. 2d 15, 53 U.S.L.W. 3234, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2977
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 1, 1984·No. No. 83-2046·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Appeal from Ct. App. Mich. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Justice Brennan would, note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. Michigan Racing Commissioner, 469 U.S. 806, 105 S. Ct. 64, 83 L. Ed. 2d 15, 53 U.S.L.W. 3234, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2977 (1984).

469 U.S. 806 (Berry v. Michigan Racing Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roush v. Pari-Mutuel Commission
917 P.2d 1133 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1996)
Carter v. City of Las Cruces
915 P.2d 336 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1996)
Carter v. CITY OF LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO
915 P.2d 336 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1996)
State v. Castleman
863 P.2d 1088 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Quinn
487 N.W.2d 194 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1992)
Keller v. State Bar
767 P.2d 1020 (California Supreme Court, 1989)
Pueblo De Cochiti v. United States
647 F. Supp. 538 (D. New Mexico, 1986)
Simmons v. Block
782 F.2d 1545 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Arrington v. LOUISIANA STATE RACING COM'N
482 So. 2d 200 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Breitzke v. United States
9 Cl. Ct. 79 (Court of Claims, 1985)
Payne v. Block
751 F.2d 1191 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)