Berry v. McBride

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 7, 2005
• Docket: 04-7654
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7654

JAMES WILLIAM BERRY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, “Newly Appointed”; JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner of Corrections; MICHAEL COLEMAN, Deputy Warden; BETTY SLAYTON, Magistrate of M.O.C.C.; CARL SHELLINGS, Unit Manager; WILLIAM KINCAID, Unit Manager; PETRISHA HENDSHEW, Postal Sup.; BRIAN STUMP, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

and

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-856)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James William Berry, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James William Berry, Sr., appeals from the district

court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Berry v. McBride, No. CA-02-856 (S.D.W. Va.

Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -