Berry v. Martin

6 Tex. 264
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 6 Tex. 264 (Berry v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Martin, 6 Tex. 264 (Tex. 1851).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The giving of a bond in a case like the present, with but one surety, is not a compliance with the statute. (Mays v. Lewis, 4 Tex. R., 1.) But in the case of an appeal from the District Court to tills court, the appeal will not be dismissed merely for informality or insufficiency in the bond, if the, appellant will immediately cure the defect by giving a sufficient bond. (Shelton v. Wade, 4 Tex. R., 148.) The principle of the rule is applicable to the present case; and the court did not err in permitting the party to amend by giving an additional surety upon his bond. Where either no bond or a void bond had been given in the first instance, it would be otherwise. (Burr v. Lewis, decided at Galveston, January Term, 1851.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Anderson
70 S.W.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Vick v. Mobeetie Land Co.
24 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Garrett v. Gay
1 White & W. 575 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1881)
Martin v. Hartwell & Chambers
1 White & W. 243 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1876)
King v. Hopkins
42 Tex. 48 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Tex. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-martin-tex-1851.