Berry v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

932 N.E.2d 337, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1541
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 25, 2010·No. 2010-0740·Published

Opinion

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, No. 3:08CV3005. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 18.6. The court will answer the following question:

[1542] “May a prisoner reimbursement policy adopted by a board of county commissioners pursuant to [R.C.] 341.19 require a convicted criminal offender to reimburse the county for the costs it incurred as a result of the offender’s confinement in a local detention facility prior to the commencement of sentence?”

Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 932 N.E.2d 337, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1541 (Ohio 2010).

932 N.E.2d 337 (Berry v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.