Berry v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman

102 A.D.3d 555, 957 N.Y.S.2d 864

This text of 102 A.D.3d 555 (Berry v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, 102 A.D.3d 555, 957 N.Y.S.2d 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about January 13, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs claims are barred by the release and were properly dismissed. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Román and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.3d 555, 957 N.Y.S.2d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-kasowitz-benson-torres-friedman-nyappdiv-2013.