Berry v. Inter-Carolina Motor Bus Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Berry v. Inter-Carolina Motor Bus Co.

151 S.E. 245, 198 N.C. 817, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 497

DecidedJanuary 22, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.E. 245 (Berry v. Inter-Carolina Motor Bus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. Inter-Carolina Motor Bus Co., 151 S.E. 245, 198 N.C. 817, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 497 (N.C. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. These motions were overruled, and in this we think there was no error.

We have read the record and the well prepared briefs of the able counsel with care. The court below gave defendant’s prayers for instructions. We think, from the facts in this case, the issues were the proper ones to have been submitted to the jury.

We see no error in the admission or exclusion of evidence during the ■trial, or in the charge of the court below. There is no new or novel proposition of law presented by. the record. It was mainly a question of fact for the jury to determine. They have answered the issues in favor of plaintiff. In a case of this kind, we have jurisdiction only to review upon appeal any decisions of the court below “upon any matter of law or legal inference.” We find in law

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. These motions were overruled, and in this we think there was no error.

We have read the record and the well prepared briefs of the able counsel with care. The court below gave defendant’s prayers for instructions. We think, from the facts in this case, the issues were the proper ones to have been submitted to the jury.

We see no error in the admission or exclusion of evidence during the ■trial, or in the charge of the court below. There is no new or novel proposition of law presented by. the record. It was mainly a question of fact for the jury to determine. They have answered the issues in favor of plaintiff. In a case of this kind, we have jurisdiction only to review upon appeal any decisions of the court below “upon any matter of law or legal inference.” We find in law

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.E. 245, 198 N.C. 817, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-inter-carolina-motor-bus-co-nc-1930.