Berry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

163 So. 2d 339, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1964
DocketNo. 63-654
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 2d 339 (Berry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 163 So. 2d 339, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

HORTON, Judge.

The appellant sought recovery for bodily injuries sustained in an accident which resulted in disability and for which she alleged the appellee had insured her. The pertinent portions of the policy provided for payment in the event of total and permanent disability continuing for a period of twelve consecutive months.1

The parties stipulated to certain essential facts.2 Upon this stipulation the court ren[340]*340dered a summary judgment in favor of the appellee and this appeal followed.

The trial judge concluded as a matter of law that in view of that portion of the stipulation quoted in footnote 2, the appellant conceded that her injury was not total and permanent, but instead that she was temporarily and totally disabled for at least twelve consecutive months.

We conclude that the learned trial judge was correct and the summary judgment should be affirmed upon the authority of Cassens v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 114 Fla. 659, 154 So. 522.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cassens v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
154 So. 522 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 2d 339, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-fidelity-casualty-co-fladistctapp-1964.