Berry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

163 So. 2d 339, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1964·No. No. 63-654·Published

Opinion

HORTON, Judge.

The appellant sought recovery for bodily injuries sustained in an accident which resulted in disability and for which she alleged the appellee had insured her. The pertinent portions of the policy provided for payment in the event of total and permanent disability continuing for a period of twelve consecutive months.1

The parties stipulated to certain essential facts.2 Upon this stipulation the court ren[340]*340dered a summary judgment in favor of the appellee and this appeal followed.

The trial judge concluded as a matter of law that in view of that portion of the stipulation quoted in footnote 2, the appellant conceded that her injury was not total and permanent, but instead that she was temporarily and totally disabled for at least twelve consecutive months.

We conclude that the learned trial judge was correct and the summary judgment should be affirmed upon the authority of Cassens v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 114 Fla. 659, 154 So. 522.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 163 So. 2d 339, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

163 So. 2d 339 (Berry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cassens v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
154 So. 522 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)