Berry v. Executors of M'Allister
1 N.C. 100
This text of 1 N.C. 100 (Berry v. Executors of M'Allister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Berry v. Executors of M'Allister, 1 N.C. 100 (N.C. 1800).
Opinion
That part of the crop in question devised by Mary to her daughter Sarah Eliza, never vested in James so as to make it is property. He acted only as an Executor of Archibald M’Allister, and it does not appear that any act of his extended to taking possession of one half of said crop as his own, and without such interference we must presume he acted as Executor. 2 Blac. 433.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-executors-of-mallister-nc-1800.