Berry v. Eureka Const. Co.

1919 OK 209, 183 P. 517, 76 Okla. 146, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 140
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 8, 1919
Docket9005
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1919 OK 209 (Berry v. Eureka Const. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Eureka Const. Co., 1919 OK 209, 183 P. 517, 76 Okla. 146, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 140 (Okla. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered and adjudged :

1st. That the petition for rehearing herein be granted.

2nd. That the opinion of Mr. Commissioner Davis, filed November 12, 1918, reversing and remanding the cause, be withdrawn.

3rd. The questions involved in this action are identical with the questions involved in the case of Nitsche v. State Security Bank of Zanesville, Ohio, et al., 69 Oklahoma, 170 Pac. 234, and the opinion of this court hi that case is controlling in the instant case. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the judgment in the instant case be affirmed under the . authority of the Nitsche case and the authorities cited in the opinion of this court in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowe v. Rowe
52 P.2d 869 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Colvin v. City of Tulsa
1926 OK 490 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Grier v. McCormick
1924 OK 261 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Berry v. McCormick
1923 OK 463 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
In re the Estate of Ferrel
192 P. 10 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK 209, 183 P. 517, 76 Okla. 146, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-eureka-const-co-okla-1919.