Berry v. Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Berry v. Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc.

263 F. App'x 805

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 25, 2008

DocketNo. 07-12562

StatusPublished

This text of 263 F. App'x 805 (Berry v. Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc., 263 F. App'x 805 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs-Appellants Dorsey Berry, Bryan Sprayberry, Chet McDonnell, Tommy Stephens, Parrish Carlyle, Bobby Parker, and Connie Taylor [806]*806have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s order dated May 16, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms that order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc. in this case.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs-Appellants Dorsey Berry, Bryan Sprayberry, Chet McDonnell, Tommy Stephens, Parrish Carlyle, Bobby Parker, and Connie Taylor [806]*806have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s order dated May 16, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms that order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc. in this case.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 F. App'x 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-cooper-standard-automotive-inc-ca11-2008.