Berry v. City of Atlanta

43 S.E.2d 191, 75 Ga. App. 278, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 529
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1947·No. 31483.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The ordinances hereinafter set out and relied upon by the City of Atlanta in this case are penal in their nature. Penal ordinances require a strict construction. Johnson v. State, 1 Ga. App. 195 (58 S.E. 265). After a careful analysis of the ordinances in question, and strictly construing all of them together as required, we are unable to find a requirement that a permit must be obtained for repairs to buildings or structures. On the other hand, section 6, of "Extracts of Building Code recommended by the National Board of Fire Underwriters, 1943 Edition" expressly provides no such permits shall be required. The reroofing of the house, giving the ordinance the strict construction required constitutes repairs and not alternations. Whittle v. Webster, 55 Ga. 180. It therefore follows that the recorder should have sustained the demurrer to the accusation, and the judgment of the superior court holding to the contrary is error.

Judgment reversed. MacIntyre, P. J., and Gardner, J.,concur.

DECIDED JUNE 14, 1947.
Otis Berry was accused in the Recorder's Court of the City of Atlanta of a charge consisting of reroofing a house without a permit from the City of Atlanta. Berry filed a demurrer in the recorder's court to the accusation contending in substance, that there is no ordinance of the city requiring such a permit, and that if certain ordinances should be so construed the same are unconstitutional and are void for being arbitrary and unreasonable. The demurrer had attached thereto as exhibits certain ordinances of the city including certain adopted excerpts from building codes. Said ordinances are herewith set forth in full, as follows:

Exhibit A.
"An Ordinance Adopting the Building Code Recommended by the National Board of Fire Underwriters, 1943 Edition, as the Building Code of the City of Atlanta.

Be it ordained by the Mayor and General Council of the City of Atlanta as follows:

"Section 1. That all matters concerning, affecting or relating to the construction, alternation, repairs, removal, demolition, equipment, use and occupancy, location and maintenance of buildings or structures, erected or to be erected in the City of Atlanta shall conform to the Building Code recommended by the National Board of Fire Underwriters, 1943 Edition, except insofar as such *Page 279 matters are otherwise provided for in the charter or ordinances of the City.

"Section 2. No building or structure shall hereafter be constructed, altered, repaired, or removed nor shall the equipment of a building, structure or premises be constructed, installed, altered, repaired or removed except in conformity with the provisions of said Building Code, and in particular after a permit has been issued by the Building Inspector as therein provided.

"Section 3. Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of said code or this ordinance shall be guilty of an offense against the City of Atlanta and upon conviction thereof in the Recorder's Court, shall be fined not exceeding $500.00 or imprisoned not exceeding 30 days for each separate offense, either or both penalties to be inflicted in the discretion of the Recorder.

"Section 4. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

"(Seal of the Clerk of Council
City of Atlanta, Georgia)          Adopted By General Council
                                           Dec. 3, 1945.
                                   Approved Dec. 7, 1945."

Exhibit B.
"Extracts of Published Ordinances of the City of Atlanta, Entitled `Departments of Buildings, the Building Code of the City of Atlanta, Effective Feb. 7, 1924, Reprinted in 1944.'

"Section 1. This Ordinance to be Known and Cited as theBuilding Code. The following provisions shall constitute and be known as the Building Code, and may be cited as such and presumptively provides for all matters concerning, affecting or relating to the construction, equipment, alteration, repair or removal of buildings or any structure whatsoever erected or to be erected in the City of Atlanta.

"Section 5. Filing Plans and Statements. 1. Before the erection, construction or alteration of any building or structure, or part of same and before the installation or alteration or the plumbing, drainage, piping, or wiring of any building, structure or premises is begun, there shall be submitted to the Inspector of Buildings an application on appropriate blanks to be furnished by the Inspector of Buildings containing a detailed statement of the specifications including the maximum live load for which each *Page 280 floor is designed when floor construction is involved in the proposed work, and accompanied by a full and complete copy of all necessary plans of such proposed work and such detail structural drawings thereof as the Inspector may require. An affidavit shall also be filed stating the proposed maximum number of persons to be accommodated at one time on each floor above the first story, and the proposed purpose for which each story is intended.

"2. Application to be attested. The application shall contain a sworn statement giving the full name, residence and business address (by street and number, whenever possible) of the owner of the building and of the owner of the premises upon which the building or structure is to be erected, altered or removed, or in which the installation or alteration or plumbing, drainage, piping or wiring is to be made. The application shall describe the location of the building, structure or premises, giving the name and address of the responsible party or parties to whom notices shall be sent for any violation of this Code which may occur during construction or alteration, and the name and address of the architect or other representative duly authorized to perform or have performed said work.

"3. Application to be made by owner or representative. The application and statement shall be made by the owner or lessee of the entire building, or by an architect, builder or other duly authorized representative of the owner or lessee.

"8. Amendments. Amendments to applications, plans, and detail drawings may be made and the Inspector of Buildings shall approve them provided the application, plans, and detail drawings, when so amended, shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Code and the requirements of the Inspector of Buildings in relation thereto.

"9. Revocation of Approval. The Inspector of Buildings shall have power to revoke any approval for any material departure from the approved applications, plans, and detail drawings, or in any case any false statement or representation as to a material fact relating to the erection, alteration, or removal of the building has been made.

"10. Limitation of Six Months. All approvals of applications, plans, and detail drawings, and amendments thereto, shall expire by limitation, six months from the date of the original approval *Page 281 of the applications, plans and detail drawings, but the limitation shall not apply to the erection of a new building under approved applications, plans, and detail drawings, when work thereunder has been begun and carried on with reasonable continuity within six months from the original approval thereof, when the work to be performed is lawful, and can be carried on without violating any provision of this Code.

"11. Ordinary Repairs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. City of Atlanta, 43 S.E.2d 191, 75 Ga. App. 278, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 529 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947).

43 S.E.2d 191 (Berry v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golden Arch Ltd. v. Town Plan Zoning Com., No. Cv95325547 (Mar. 19, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 3356 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)