Berry v. Braddock Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Berry v. Braddock Borough

172 Pa. 602, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 820

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 6, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 68

StatusPublished

This text of 172 Pa. 602 (Berry v. Braddock Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. Braddock Borough, 172 Pa. 602, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 820 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

The judgment in this ease is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in the case of William Bowers v. The Borough of Braddock, No. 64, October term, 1895. The motion to quash is refused as there is no inconsistency in filing exceptions to the report of the viewers and at the same time entering an appeal to the common pleas under the act of June 13, 1874, P. L. 283.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

The judgment in this ease is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in the case of William Bowers v. The Borough of Braddock, No. 64, October term, 1895. The motion to quash is refused as there is no inconsistency in filing exceptions to the report of the viewers and at the same time entering an appeal to the common pleas under the act of June 13, 1874, P. L. 283.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 Pa. 602, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-braddock-borough-pa-1896.