Berry v. Berry

Appellate Court of Illinois

Berry v. Berry

190 Ill. App. 215

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 31, 1914

DocketGen. No. 5,936

StatusPublished

This text of 190 Ill. App. 215 (Berry v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. Berry, 190 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Ne exeat, § 8*—when objection to power of court to issue not preserved for review. Where an appeal bond does not recite an appeal from a distinct order for a writ of ne exeat, which was not questioned in the trial court, the question whether the issuance of such a writ was beyond the powers of the court because not within the letter of the statute was not saved for review.

Whitney, J., took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Ne exeat, § 8*—when objection to power of court to issue not preserved for review. Where an appeal bond does not recite an appeal from a distinct order for a writ of ne exeat, which was not questioned in the trial court, the question whether the issuance of such a writ was beyond the powers of the court because not within the letter of the statute was not saved for review.

Whitney, J., took no part in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 Ill. App. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-berry-illappct-1914.