Berry v. Berry
This text of Berry v. Berry (Berry v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000044 27-DEC-2011 02:38 PM
NO. SCWC-10-0000044
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
JULIANNE NGUYEN BERRY, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
WAYNE FOSTER BERRY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NO. CAAP-10-0000044; FC-D NO. 06-1-0211)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, Acoba, Duffy, McKenna, JJ.;
and Nakayama, J., dissenting)
The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on
November 10, 2011 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, Wayne Foster
Berry is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument.
The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding
scheduling.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 27, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Berry v. Berry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-berry-haw-2011.