Berry v. Ahmad
This text of 923 F.2d 847 (Berry v. Ahmad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
923 F.2d 847
Berry (Jagdish P., Virendra, Surendra K.), Berry Associates,
Inc., A.J., Inc.
v.
Ahmad (Sohail), Garlitz (John E.), Govil (Akhil K.), Kumar
(Vijay), Mahal (Baljeet S.), Mehrotra (P.P.), Sandhir
(S.L.), Sighu (Harjit S.), Zaman (Qumar Ul), Idress
(Mohammed), Nava (Samuel N.), Villanueva (Romulo), Dale (William P.)
NO. 90-3005
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
JAN 25, 1991
Appeal From: E.D.Va.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
923 F.2d 847, 1991 WL 5946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-ahmad-ca4-1991.