Berry Ray Williams v. State
This text of Berry Ray Williams v. State (Berry Ray Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 6, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01416-CR No. 05-17-01417-CR
BERRY RAY WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 16-60034-86-F, 17-00260-86-F
ORDER By order entered on March 21, 2018, the Court granted appellant’s second motion to
extend the time to file his brief. The Court’s order extended the due date for appellant’s brief to
April 20, 2018. On April 25, 2018, the Clerk transmitted a notice to appellant informing him
that the time for filing his brief had expired and directing him to file, within ten days, both the
brief and an extension motion. To date, appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s notice, and he
has not filed a brief.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has
not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708
(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Berry Ray Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-ray-williams-v-state-texapp-2018.