Berry Packing Corp. v. Atlantic Veal Corp.

302 A.D.2d 417, 754 N.Y.S.2d 550
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to enforce a guarantee, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Barasch, J.), dated December 20, 2000, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment on the second and third causes of action on the issue of liability, and the defendants cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

[418] We agree with the Supreme Court that there are issues of fact as to whether any of the defendants so dominated the lessee corporation, Tri-Way Veal Packers, Inc. (hereinafter TriWay), as to justify piercing the corporate veil to hold them liable for a judgment against Tri-Way (see First Bank of Ams. v Motor Car Funding, 257 AD2d 287). Altman, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry Packing Corp. v. Atlantic Veal Corp., 302 A.D.2d 417, 754 N.Y.S.2d 550 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

302 A.D.2d 417 (Berry Packing Corp. v. Atlantic Veal Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.
66 A.D.2d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
151 East Post Road Corp. v. Eubanks
38 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Alpha Bytes Computer Corp. v. Slaton
307 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)