Berrios v. Royal Farms, Inc.

254 A.D.2d 216, 679 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11362

This text of 254 A.D.2d 216 (Berrios v. Royal Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berrios v. Royal Farms, Inc., 254 A.D.2d 216, 679 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about November 26, 1997, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff asserts that defendant supermarket failed to maintain the entrance to its premises in a safe condition. Whether plaintiff should have observed and avoided the empty carton that allegedly caused her to fall and whether defendant created the hazardous condition or had notice of it are issues of fact. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 216, 679 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berrios-v-royal-farms-inc-nyappdiv-1998.