Berrios v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berrios v. City of New York

188 A.D.2d 411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 411 (Berrios v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berrios v. City of New York, 188 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered January 28, 1992, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to consider petitioner for a tenancy in a City-owned apartment under procedures affording him due process, dismissed the petition, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Petitioner claims he was entitled under respondents’ regulations to be evaluated under the Unauthorized Occupancy Program (UOP) for a tenancy. In February 1992, the UOP policy was superseded by the Successor Tenant Rules under which petitioner is currently being evaluated for a tenancy. Accordingly, the appeal is moot. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered January 28, 1992, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to consider petitioner for a tenancy in a City-owned apartment under procedures affording him due process, dismissed the petition, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Petitioner claims he was entitled under respondents’ regulations to be evaluated under the Unauthorized Occupancy Program (UOP) for a tenancy. In February 1992, the UOP policy was superseded by the Successor Tenant Rules under which petitioner is currently being evaluated for a tenancy. Accordingly, the appeal is moot. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berrios-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1992.