Berridge v. Glassey

7 A. 749, 4 Sadler 581
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 31, 1887·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

While a tenant cannot be permitted to controvert the title of his landlord under whom he entered into possession, yet if one in possession under claim of title is induced to accept a lease through misrepresentation, fraud, or trick of the lessor, he is. not estopped from setting up a title superior to that of his lessor. So we think if the lease be made through mutual mistake of' the facts by both parties, the lessee is not estopped from setting, up her- superior title, if she was in possession when she executed the lease.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berridge v. Glassey, 7 A. 749, 4 Sadler 581 (Pa. 1887).

7 A. 749 (Berridge v. Glassey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockwood v. Carter Oil Co.
80 S.E. 814 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1913)
Meeker v. Kaelin
173 F. 216 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington, 1909)
Nicrosi v. Phillipi
91 Ala. 299 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)