Berresford v. Broughton

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Berresford v. Broughton

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 369

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 6, 1733

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 369 (Berresford v. Broughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berresford v. Broughton, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 369 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1733).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. Lewis of the Complainant’s Counsel, That the Vestry of St. Thomas’s Parish who had Interpleaded in this Cause may be made [370]*370Parties to the Bill, The same was Ordered accordingly, unless Cause be Shewn by the Twentieth Day of this Instant September, and that the Reverend Mr. Hasell one of the Said Vestry be Served with an Attested Copy of this Order.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. Lewis of the Complainant’s Counsel, That the Vestry of St. Thomas’s Parish who had Interpleaded in this Cause may be made [370]*370Parties to the Bill, The same was Ordered accordingly, unless Cause be Shewn by the Twentieth Day of this Instant September, and that the Reverend Mr. Hasell one of the Said Vestry be Served with an Attested Copy of this Order.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berresford-v-broughton-ctchansc-1733.