Berquist v. Washington Mutual Bank
128 S. Ct. 1124, 552 U.S. 1166, 169 L. Ed. 2d 950, 76 U.S.L.W. 3392, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 1199, 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 704
Opinion
PHILIP BERQUIST
v.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Supreme Court of United States.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berquist v. Washington Mutual Bank, 128 S. Ct. 1124, 552 U.S. 1166, 169 L. Ed. 2d 950, 76 U.S.L.W. 3392, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 1199, 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 704 (U.S. 2008).
128 S. Ct. 1124 (Berquist v. Washington Mutual Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLC
70 F. Supp. 3d 816 (E.D. Texas, 2014)
Paulissen v. MEI Technologies, Inc.
942 F. Supp. 2d 658 (S.D. Texas, 2013)
Eastin v. Entergy Corp.
42 So. 3d 1163 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Elder v. Berghuis
644 F. Supp. 2d 888 (W.D. Michigan, 2009)
Martin v. J.A.M. Distributing Co.
674 F. Supp. 2d 822 (E.D. Texas, 2009)
Arensdorf v. Geithner
329 F. App'x 514 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
National Committee to Preserve Social Security v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
601 F. Supp. 2d 505 (E.D. New York, 2009)
Santiago-Sepúlveda v. Esso Standard Oil Co.
256 F.R.D. 39 (D. Puerto Rico, 2009)
Ak v. Nb
66 So. 3d 242 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.
602 F. Supp. 2d 829 (W.D. Michigan, 2008)
Stalley v. Methodist Healthcare
517 F.3d 911 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)