Beroukhim v. FDIC

Ninth Circuit

Beroukhim v. FDIC

168 F.3d 497, 1999 WL 38623

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 1999

Docket95-56217

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 F.3d 497 (Beroukhim v. FDIC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beroukhim v. FDIC, 168 F.3d 497, 1999 WL 38623 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

168 F.3d 497

David BEROUKHIM; Baroukh Beroukhim; BMB Properties, a
California General Partnership; Yaghoub Beroukhim;
Masoud Brokhim; Shanin Makhani,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FDIC, Statutory Successor to the Resolution Trust Corp., as
Receiver for Mercury Fed. Savings and Loan Association;
Carolyn J. Smith, aka Carolyn Marcial; Northwestern National
Ins. Company, a Wisconsin corporation; David & Joseph
Melamed, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-56217.
D.C. No.CV-92-07644-WMB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 26, 1999.

Before FERGUSON, BEEZER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court has reviewed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal of appeal and underlying district court action filed herein on January 11, 1999. The court approves the stipulation and in accordance with its terms, it is, now

ORDERED that the above-captioned appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. It is further,

ORDERED that the clerk of this court shall issue the mandate forthwith and send the same to the clerk of the district court together with a certified copy of this order and a certified copy of the stipulation filed by the parties on January 11, 1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI