Beroo v. Donelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beroo v. Donelli

4 A.D.3d 595, 770 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1086

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 595 (Beroo v. Donelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beroo v. Donelli, 4 A.D.3d 595, 770 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits damaging state property. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Britt v Goord, 290 AD2d 627 [2002]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits damaging state property. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Britt v Goord, 290 AD2d 627 [2002]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 595, 770 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beroo-v-donelli-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack