Berok v. New York Central Railroad
227 A.D. 779, 237 N.Y.S. 730
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that an issue of fact was presented as to whether plaintiff’s conduct was such as to result in an irrevocable election to take compensation. (Ellich v. Hamburg-Amerikanische P. A. Gessellschafi, 226 App. Div. 32.) Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berok v. New York Central Railroad, 227 A.D. 779, 237 N.Y.S. 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
227 A.D. 779 (Berok v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Tate v. Estate of Dickens
276 A.D.2d 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Liston v. Hicks
243 A.D. 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)