Bernunzio v. Plumb
242 A.D. 673
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the authority of Lehr v. S. & H. P. R. R. Co. (118 N. Y. 556); Knaisch v. Joline (138 App. Div. 854); Byan v. Brooklyn City R. Co. (216 id. 732); Morey v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. (234 id. 210; affd., 260 N. Y. 691).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bernunzio v. Plumb, 242 A.D. 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 673 (Bernunzio v. Plumb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morey v. New York Central Railroad Company
184 N.E. 148 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Knaisch v. Joline
138 A.D. 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)