Bernunzio v. Plumb

242 A.D. 673

This text of 242 A.D. 673 (Bernunzio v. Plumb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernunzio v. Plumb, 242 A.D. 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the authority of Lehr v. S. & H. P. R. R. Co. (118 N. Y. 556); Knaisch v. Joline (138 App. Div. 854); Byan v. Brooklyn City R. Co. (216 id. 732); Morey v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. (234 id. 210; affd., 260 N. Y. 691).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morey v. New York Central Railroad Company
184 N.E. 148 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Knaisch v. Joline
138 A.D. 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernunzio-v-plumb-nyappdiv-1934.