Berntzon v. Edwardsen
152 N.W. 832, 161 Wis. 180, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 190
This text of 152 N.W. 832 (Berntzon v. Edwardsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Berntzon v. Edwardsen, 152 N.W. 832, 161 Wis. 180, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 190 (Wis. 1915).
Opinions
In this case, though the idea prevails that the order should be affirmed, there is such conflict of views as to the ground therefor, it is considered the general practice in such situation of pronouncing judgment of affirmance without any opinion being filed should be followed and such is the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stierle v. Rohmeyer
260 N.W. 647 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 N.W. 832, 161 Wis. 180, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berntzon-v-edwardsen-wis-1915.