Bernstein v. Stuehringer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bernstein v. Stuehringer

284 A.D.2d 490, 726 N.Y.S.2d 583

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, the Estate of Myra Seftel Reisman and Sandy Bernstein in Action No. 2 appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated August 22, 2000, which denied their motion to compel the third-party defendant St. Charles Hospital and Rehabilitation Center to respond to a notice for discovery and inspection.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion (see, Cirineo v Pepsi Cola Bottling Co., 260 AD2d 341). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, the Estate of Myra Seftel Reisman and Sandy Bernstein in Action No. 2 appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated August 22, 2000, which denied their motion to compel the third-party defendant St. Charles Hospital and Rehabilitation Center to respond to a notice for discovery and inspection.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion (see, Cirineo v Pepsi Cola Bottling Co., 260 AD2d 341). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Bernstein v. Stuehringer, 284 A.D.2d 490, 726 N.Y.S.2d 583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

284 A.D.2d 490 (Bernstein v. Stuehringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related