Bernstein v. Spatz
248 A.D. 769
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 769 (Bernstein v. Spatz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bernstein v. Spatz, 248 A.D. 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Order restraining defendant pendente lite from continuing in the employment of a concern named Murray’s Inc. and from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the business of selling millinery and ladies’ apparel in Far Rockaway, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-spatz-nyappdiv-1936.