Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bernstein v. Spatz

Bernstein v. Spatz

248 A.D. 769
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order restraining defendant pendente lite from continuing in the employment of a concern named Murray’s Inc. and from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the business of selling millinery and ladies’ apparel in Far Rockaway, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernstein v. Spatz, 248 A.D. 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 769 (Bernstein v. Spatz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.